Could be. I've read Enuma Enlish a while ago, seem to be a dozen or two names there we could attribute as gods.Some call them Planets in a lot more literal way then we do here, however, but that is fine as well.
While if we count Sitchins work we have pictograms of En.lil, En.ki Anu and others, but that seem to be falling into "Nefilim" and not "gods"... But then if we decide to call them Gods...
Don't really know. : )
I'm big fan of the idea words are not what they represent, so yes, in my view "gods" is a word. Its also something so obvious, that it feels strange to have to write it. Its not whatever we call with it, we may call with it a planet, or a feeling or anything, really, nor is that the same in each place worshiping or calculating something.
May mean I will never find astrology that works for me, who knows. But is not a concept I will abandon anytime soon, as in metaphysics I view that as more important then any system.
As otherwise people tent to get a lot of... Thinking problems, have seen it in any system I've seen so far in metaphysics and to some degree even in science.
Just my view, of course.
About the Ram, Pisces and Aquarius - as far as I'm aware that is just the precession of the equinox. Earths tilting pointing to specific sign every 2k years or something...Started around Jesus the Pisces and in a hundred or so years, the "new age" people sink about...
No idea what is your explanation about it, but no gods there that I'm aware of, as well.
I think we should agree to disagree and move on?This won't lead anywhere, too much fundamental stuff we view in a different way.