@Gmuli
Why don’t they talk about God in zodiac astrology now? Mystery.
I think we may need a great definition of God to follow this. I will try to provide some summary of my view on the topic of old definitions of God, so we have what to start from. : )
Although I have to say I don't think the Chinese 神 has much to do with religion definition of God in most cases. Most religions, anyway.
I always enjoyed the idea metaphysics are the higher sciences. Stuff humanity hasn't collectively understood yet.
Since that is "higher sciences" and not "higher religions" I'm more comfortable without too many gods in there...
Does God suggest spirituality... Depends how we define spirituality. The way schools I enjoy do, it doesn't.
One think we view is that humanity, for a very long time worshiped what is called "planetary logos". That is the consciousness guiding the paths of people on Earth(very connected to the ionosphere, massive amounts of electricity in upper atmosphere).
But in the stream of consciousnesses we call "channel" this is a very near point of an endless path, more or less. Even the Sun(solar logos) is providing much more encompassing view. And so some worshiped the Sun.
Still very physical entity, however. With time, I would expect we will find more to worship. Other civilizations, seeding nations etc. And with some luck we may stop, someday, and figure out all is fellow travelers on an very long journey, just glimpses of it perceivable from Earth.
So the planetary Logos, however is still very physical entity, same as our personalities here on Earth, just a few initiations higher. Same for Solar Logos, although again, few initiations after that.
Does that mean we can become Logos someday... Sure, that is , in theory, how the whole process unfolds. Not to mention we already are for the endless amounts of cells, organs and levels in our physical body and nearby environment. In that sense, all the old "gods" were not spiritual, they were just fellow travelers on the same way we know. Yet taking more encompassing roles or bringing down spiritual aspects reflected from above. But from very nearby steps of it.
Astrology is just influences of Rays and cosmic flows arriving at us, together with the structure reflecting same patterns in ever expanding nature, in my view. So we don't need gods for astrology. Same as we don't need them for general magnetism/electricity.
Short way to say it - I'm not sure I can understand what you mean without an awesomely clear definition of what you mean by God. But it seems very different then what I view as god. And while we do have the "Source" as perspective and understanding that is soo far away from all this, that doesn't have much relevance, even if logically it probably should.
So can you define what you mean by God?
I'm also not entirely sure what we are talking about, to be fair. : )
I see its related to old sources of astrology and to Gods(so religion, for back then, most often). But I don't get what about them?
If its about "did astrology come from Sumer" then... Well, we have Kabbalistic astrology that definitely doesn't seem to have come from Sumer. They believe it was "received" on top of a mountain and strange or not I'm inclined to believe an outside infusion connected to it... We have vedic astrology with sources from Sanskrit that also doesn't seem connected to Sumer.
So did all that came from Egypt. Don't know. But I doubt it. More so vedic then the others. As I think the sanskrit sources are old, aren't they?
I have reasons to enjoy the idea of other places something can come from even more so in sanskrit. : )
But all this is for historians, I'm really not focusing on that. I'm interested in ancient sources only in the cases they manage to keep the view of something, that lost purity in the centuries after that. So we connect and can perceive it more fully. That is not always the case, can't say its even "often" the case. But where something started, I really don't know. One of the reason I kept repeating "I don't know". : )
So I don't fully understand what we are talking about. If its about gods - I generally avoid gods in metaphysics. I think I explained why. There are exceptions of course, but does that fall into definition of "god" is something we have to work with clear definition to say.
If its about Egypt, I have doubts it started from that, who knows, with some crafty switcheroos maybe its possible for much of it, but I don't think for all, as explained. : )